Legal Services

0330 606 9548

0330 606 9548

Request a callback

What is Occupiers Liability?

5th June 2018

Occupiers' liability is an area of law which deals with the duty of care owed by those who own or lease property, to the people who visit the property.

An occupier has a duty of care to all visitors to ensure the premises are reasonably safe for them, unless they are aware of a specific danger with the premises, in which case the occupier must take steps to highlight the dangers which are present.

If someone owns or occupies land or property and an individual lawfully visits those premises (for example a post worker delivering letters), the owner / occupier has a duty to ensure that the premises are reasonably safe for the purposes for which the visitor was on the premises.

If a child is visiting the premises, the occupier must take additional steps to care for their safety as children can be less careful than adults.

However, no such duty exists to care for the safety of a trespasser unless there are dangers on the premises which the owner / occupier is (or should be) aware of. If there are any dangers on the premises, the owner / occupier should take steps to make individuals accessing the premises aware of these dangers. If they fail to do so and someone is injured because of the dangers the owner / occupier may be found to blame even if the individual did not have the owner / occupier’s permission to visit the property.

If someone does suffer injury as a result of an accident on the premises they may be able to make an Occupiers Liability claim for compensation.

For free legal advice call our Personal Injury Solicitors on 0330 606 9587 or contact us online and we will help you.

What Types of Premises are Included?

The types of premises that Occupiers Liability law relates to include public places such as shopping malls, department stores, car parks, museums, hospitals, parks, restaurants and private residences. 

Confusingly, an Occupier’s Liability claim is sometimes referred to as a Public Liability claim and vice versa. Public liability claims generally cover all claims where someone has been injured in a public place or on someone else’s property. These claims relate to the duties of both property owners and those who have some control over the premises where the accident happened. There is a specific Act of Parliament called the Occupier’s Liability Act 1957 (as amended) which sets out the duties of occupiers.

When you are out and about as a member of the general public, you are legally entitled to be able to enjoy public spaces without facing anything which might cause an unreasonable risk to your health or safety. It is the duty of the occupier to ensure that this is the case.

So, for example, shopping malls are usually managed by a company and this company would be responsible for ensuring that the mall as a whole is safe for shoppers. Individual shop units may then fall under the responsibility of the owner of that shop. The occupier is then responsible for managing risks in that environment, from ensuring the plumbing and wiring meets the necessary safety standards right through to cleaning up spillages that could pose a slip hazard.

Hospitals are also covered under Occupier’s Liability law. If you are a visitor to a hospital, the occupier of the hospital must ensure that the hospital premises are reasonably safe for you. If you slip on a highly polished or recently mopped floor and are injured, you may be able to claim compensation against the occupiers of the hospital for your injuries.

Example – Slipping in an Icy Carpark

If an Occupier’s Liability Claim is made, then during the case the Court will consider whether or not the occupier was in breach of their duty of care. Just because an accident has happened does not necessarily mean that the occupier has neglected their duties.

In a recent case, a gentleman called Mr Cook was injured when he slipped on ice on an unmanned car park owned by Swansea City Council. He brought a claim against the Council on the basis that the Council should have gritted the car park when ice was forecast. The Council did not have a pro-active system of gritting the car park, but relied on members of the public to report the snow or ice before sending out a gritting crew.

Mr Cook lost his case. The Court compared the costs of pro-actively gritting the car park when ice or snow was forecast to the risks of someone slipping and being injured. They found that the costs of pro-active gritting would have been disproportionately expensive. As such the Council had taken reasonable care to protect visitors to the car park with their policy of re-active gritting. 

Although Mr Jones lost his claim against the Council, there are many examples of injured people winning their claims after being involved in an accident in a public place as a result of the failure of the occupier to ensure that the premises were safe for visitors. 

Accidents at Work

An employer has a duty of care to ensure that their workers are provided with a safe place in which to work, that their work processes are safe, they have well maintained and appropriate tools and equipment to carry out their work and that their fellow workers are competent. Where a worker is working in premises away from their employer’s place of work, their employer still has a duty to ensure the workplace is reasonably safe for their employees to work there. If they do not and the worker is injured, the employer may be found to blame.

Similarly any person who has control of the workplace where the worker is contracted out to work has a duty of care to that worker. Under the Workplace Regulations 1992, they will need to ensure that the workplace and equipment is maintained in an efficient state, efficient working order and in good repair. If they are not and the worker is injured, the person who has control of the premises will be liable for the breach of the Regulation and the injured worker may be able to bring a claim against them. This claim could be made on the basis that the person who has control of the premises has breached the Workplace Regulations, and therefore this is evidence of negligence. 

If you are injured when working somewhere that is under your employer’s control, you may be entitled to make an Employer’s Liability Claim instead.

If You Suffer an Injury

If you are injured in an accident on premises under the control of an ‘occupier’ and the accident was caused by the occupier not upholding their duty of care, then you may be entitled to make an Occupiers Liability Claim.

If you’re able to, the first thing you should do is report the accident to the management of the premises and ensure that details of the accident are recorded in the accident book. It’s a good idea to take photos of the scene of the accident as well.

If there are other people around who saw the accident take place, the aftermath or the events leading up to the accident then get their contact details. Their eyewitness account could be very valuable in supporting your claim.

At Co-op Legal Services, our Personal Injury Solicitors specialise in handling Occupiers Liability claims. If you have been injured and you believe that you may be entitled to make an Occupiers Liability claim, then contact us. We can assess your claim for free and guide you through the next steps.

For free legal advice call our Personal Injury Lawyers on 0330 606 9587 or contact us online and we will call you.

Call 0330 606 9587

We will use your information in accordance with our Privacy Policy to contact you in relation to your enquiry

I am very impressed. Each situation arising in the complicated case and relevant rules and laws were explained clearly and truthfully and my interests were protected. M. U., Birmingham
More testimonials

Honest, simple and cost effective. T.R., Croydon

My case was handled perfectly. Great customer service. D.O., London

The solicitor was always helpful and consistent in helping with my claim. Overall most tolerant and pleasant and knowledgeable in all my requests. Miss M., West Midlands
More Testimonials

I could not fault my file handler, she was always helpful and very courteous. F.B., Eastbourne
More Testimonials

My case handler was extremely helpful thank you so much. Very courteous and so quick in bringing my case to an end. K.D., Liverpool

My case was handled perfectly. Great customer service. D.O., London

Customer Satisfaction

4.5 stars out of 5 for Customer Satisfaction Rating

4.3 stars based on 691 Independent Surveys 

Back to top